Skip Navigation

More Information

Policy & Submissions

Member Signup

New to Ag Institute? Join Now

Online Membership Application

Policy & Submissions

Go to: AIA Policy Position Statements
Go to: AIA Submissions
Go to: How does AIA develop policy?

AIA Policy Position Statements

Animal Welfare in Australia: The welfare of animals in Australia's agricultural production in a critical responsibility for farmers and graziers, stock handlers, abattoirs and live exporters. Their welfare is a pre-condition for a social licence to produce animal-sourced food and fibre.

Read the whole policy statement here.

Sustainable Use of Water and the Murray Darling Basin Plan: The purpose of the Murray Darling Basin Plan was to take a balanced adaptive approach to water management, with a commitment to optimise social, economic and environmental outcomes. The AIA advocates that the definition of sustainable use of water be revisited so that communities, primary producers and the natural environment obtain an equitable outcome.

Read the whole policy statement here.

Energy Policy: Energy management including its generation, procurement and use, are important for primary producers and the agricultural sector more broadly.

While energy is only one input into the farming sector, it impacts every farmer. The cost of inputs for Australian agricultural production are rising. This increasing cost base is contributing to the reduction of the country's agricultural productivity.

Read the whole policy statement here

Biotechnology and Agricultural Innovation Policy Paper:   Advances in biotechnology tools provide opportunities to improve crop and livestock productivity by breeding higher yielding, better quality and more reliable varieties (such as with drought tolerance, insect or disease resistance) that can benefit society in general through improvements in health, the economy and the environment.

Read the whole policy statement here

Biosecurity Policy Paper:  Australia’s geographic location and isolation from other agricultural production and trading countries has meant that we have been free of many of the pests and diseases which trouble other producing countries. This has given us a competitive advantage both in costs and reduced complexities of production processes and in the world market place.

Read the whole policy statement here

Agricultural Science and Innovation Policy Paper:  Advances in agriculture depend on innovation underpinned by science. These advances lead to improved productivity as well as improved outcomes of the natural resource base, animal welfare, plant and animal quarantine and health, and food safety. They also lead to the development of adaptive management approaches that ensure increased resilience for the agriculture sector in response to system changes including climate change and variability.  There are many examples of science-based improvements in agriculture and animal production systems and increasingly these are being enhanced by advances in information technology and data management that enable sophisticated monitoring and evaluation of systems that improve decision making, financial outcome and risk management.

Read the whole policy statement here

Professional Accreditation - A Chartered Agricultural Professional Scheme:  Ag Institute Australia (AIA), the body representing agricultural and natural resource management professionals, is sponsoring the development of a national accreditation scheme for professionals working in the Agricultural and the Natural Resource Management Sciences.  The scheme under development is voluntary and Chartered Agricultural Professionals (CAPs) will demonstrate that they have the professionalism, commitment, education, expertise and experience to make a difference in a client's business.

Read the whole policy statement here

Mining and co-existence on agricultural land policy statement:  Mining and agriculture have been part of the landscape in Australia for many decades.  Originally, mining had little impact on agriculture and the legislation in Australia was largely enacted when mining had a relatively small impact on the landscape.  Current legislation generally ensures the State owns the mineral resources below the surface of the land and landholders have the rights to farm the surface of the land.  This has enabled the State to secure a royalty stream from mining activities, and regulate mining activities.  Landholders usually have rights to underground water in aquifers below their farm, but most aquifers now have regulations to prevent over-exploitation.  Until recently (the last fifty years or so) mining had little impact on agriculture, but with large-scale mechanisation and the exploitation of underground resources such as coal seam gas, mining and agriculture have struggled to co-exist.

Read the whole policy statement here

Climate change- Agricultures adaptation and resilience to climatic change and variability: Global warming has been on the collective international conscience since at least the middle of the last century.  For many decades, the voices of climate and associated scientists have called for recognition of the impact of human activities on climate change, and the need for adaptative developments to a world with a significantly different climate profile.  The urgency of that call has intensified in recent decades with the Inter-government Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) publishing its international assessment reports.  These reports, issued every few years, have gathered and analysed the latest scientific research in areas related to climate change as well as climate assessments and measurements.  The clear result of increasing rapid human induced climatic changes suggests what was once thought to be a problem for future generations is a problem for our current generation and those that immediately follow…

Read the whole policy statement here

The Agricultural Research and Development Model Policy Paper:  The current R&D Corporation model was established by the PIERD Act in 1989.  (https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2014C00582).  This enables the Federal Government to collect a levy from agricultural producers.  The rate of the levy is recommended by the relevant industry body and is matched, by Government funds for R&D purposes $ for $ up to 0.5% Gross Value of Production.  This model has served Australian agriculture very well.  It has enabled Agricultural industries to fund RD&E, which benefits the industry as a whole.  However, since their establishment, agricultural RD&E has had major change and the R&D Corporations have responded variously to these changes. 

 Read the whole policy statement here

 

 

AIA SUBMISSIONS

AIA SUBMISSION TO THE MODERNISATION OF THE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SYSTEM - 2019

AIA Submission into the RDC system

AIA SUBMISSION INTO THE PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION DRAFT REPORT ON REGULATION OF AUSTRALIAN AGRICULTURE

AIA Submission into Regulation in Agriculture

Appendix A - Biosecurity

Appendix B - Biotechnology

SUBMISSION INTO THE PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY ON INNOVATION IN AGRICULTURE 2015

AIA Innovation in Agriculture Submission

GREEN PAPER SUBMISSION 2014

Agricultural Competitiveness Green Paper

SENATE RURAL AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS & TRANSPORT RFERENCES COMMITTEE

Inquiry into industry structures and systems governing the imposition and disbursement of marketing and research and development (R&D) levies in the agricultural sector

RESPONSE TO THE DRAFT MURRAY DARLING BASIN PLAN

Response on Draft Murray-Darling Basin Plan

SUBMISSION TO THE RURAL & REGIONAL AFFAIRS AND TRANSPORT REFERENCES COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO THE R&D LEGISLATION

Senate Inquiry R&D Levies Oct 2014

AIAST Submission to the Inquiry into the impact of the Murray Darling Plan in Regional Australia (27 January 2010)

Read the Full AIAST Submission pdf here.

 

How are policy statements and submissions developed in AIA?

In order to develop its policy positions, AIA uses a member based Special Interest Group called the Advocacy and Policy Special Interest Group (APSIG).  The role of the APSIG amongst other things, is to:

  • Identify, in collaboration with the Board, issues/topics of importance and/or relevance to the AIA that require policies to be developed;
  • Develop policies that have relevance to the AIA’s Charter and its members;
  • Propose ways of advocating AIA policies to Government at national and State levels and to link with state Divisions of AIA;
  • Undertake the development of submissions as required consistent with AIA policy positions; and
  • Report policy and advocacy activities and outcomes to members, including feature articles in the Journal.
  • Annually review all AIA policies and recommend amendments/modifications as required to the Board.

 

Interested in Policy Development?

If you are an AIA member and interested in joining APSIG please contact your Divisional chair and arrange for a nomination to the board.  Similarly if you identify issues of policy significance where you believe AIA should have a policy position advise your Divisional Chair.  Alternatively forward your expression of interest and/or advice to admin@aginstitute.com.au